C O M E N T A R I S M O
About me
  • @dropship-i-o
  • USA
  • Language
    english
  • Avg. comments per day
    1
  • Member since
    September 05, 2018
  • Last comment on
    April 29, 2019
We have found 35 comments from @dropship-i-o on newsbitcoin!
China Updates Crypto Rankings, Downgrades Bitcoin - Bitcoin News
😒 Not Good
blockchain | September 21, 2018
EOS? Are they serious? Do people not realize that EOS ERC20 tokens will be worthless and non-redeemable when the EOS platform launches with real EOS coins? It even said so on their website.
Norwegian Startup Bitruption Plans to Launch a Localbitcoins Competitor - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
ethereum | November 06, 2018
“Tax avoidance” is not illegal. “Tax evasion” is. I am a “Tax avoider” not a “tax evader”. Look up the legal definitions of those terms. There is a huge difference. Everything I do is perfectly legal. Why do you support a system that allows me to get away with stuff like this while it forces you to be enslaved to it by making you think that paying taxes is what real “men” do?
Markets Update: XRP Briefly Dethrones ETH as Second Largest Crypto
😄 Good
cryptocurrency-altcoins | September 21, 2018
XRP is Fiat. There's not even a blockchain backing it.
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😄 Good
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
Are you talking about the “legal” definition of currency? Just because it’s the “legal” definition doesn’t mean I agree with it. However, it is important to know what it is. It’s the difference from going to jail or getting a tax cut from using crypto.
FINRA Issues Its First Crypto Disciplinary Action - Bitcoin News
😕 Eh
cryptocurrency-regulation | September 13, 2018
Get out of Fiat before it is too late and you can't leave.
US Crypto Investors Incurred $5.7 Billion in Unrealized Losses Last Year
😋 Loved It
cryptocurrency-taxes | January 20, 2019
Wow, your stats are spot on. I lost around $700. Not going to report USD tax tho. I never invested a single USD into crypto. Not your currency not your tax not your government.
It’s Time We Began Pricing Things in Satoshis - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
bitcoincash | January 10, 2019
Without a central authority telling us what to do. It’s hard to change to Satoshi’s. It’s like trying to add 00’s to the Bolivar without Maduro. It just ain’t going to happen. Satoshi N. Should have denominated BTC in Satoshi’s or have created 21 Trillion Bitcoin from the beginning. Or we could just do a simple fork I’m sure everyone will agree on and add a 0 or two. Or even better. Do a fork with automatic 0 addition or substraction. Say 51% of the blockchain transactions use 0.1 amounts, then the system will automatically display 1.0 amounts. Say 51% of the network uses 10.0 amounts, then the system will automatically subtract a 0 to once again display 1.0 amounts.
Norwegian Startup Bitruption Plans to Launch a Localbitcoins Competitor - Bitcoin News
😒 Not Good
ethereum | November 06, 2018
You asked me if a was a “criminal” or “Terrorist” supporter. Those are legal terms. I am against the legal system itself. A “criminal” is “an individual who has been found guilty of the commission of conduct that causes social harm and that is punishable by law”. I don’t do that nor have I endorsed that. A “Terrorist” is Someone who uses “unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property in order to coerce or intimidate a government or the civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives.” I have never supported the use of lawful or unlawful use of violence. One of the reasons I am against the legal system is because it approves the lawful use of violence. A.k.a. “Legal Terrorism”.
Norwegian Startup Bitruption Plans to Launch a Localbitcoins Competitor - Bitcoin News
😃 Like It
ethereum | November 06, 2018
They forgot to mention OpenBazaar. Way safer to trade there and no KYC.
Sales Tax and Bitcoin in the United States Can Be Confusing - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
cryptocurrency-taxes | September 12, 2018
SALEAn agreement by which one of the contracting parties, called the seller, gives a thing and passes the title to it, in exchange for a certain price in current money, to the other party, who is called the buyer or purchaser, who, on his part, agrees to pay such price.This contract differs from a barter or exchange in this, that in the latter the price or consideration, instead of being paid in money, is paid in goods or merchandise, susceptible of a valuation. It differs from accord and satisfaction, because in that contract, the thing is given for the purpose of quieting a claim, and not for a price. An onerous gift, when the burden it imposes is the payment of a sum of money, is, when accepted, in the nature of a sale. When partition is made between two or more joint owners of a chattel, it would seem, the contract is in the nature of a barter.To constitute a valid sale there must be, 1. Proper parties. 2. A thing which is the object of the contract. 3. A price agreed upon; and, 4. The consent of the contracting parties, and the performance of certain acts required to complete the contract. These will be separately considered.As a general rule all persons sui juris may be either buyers or sellers. But to this rule there are several exceptions. 1. There is a class of persons who are incapable of purchasing except sub modo, as infants, and married women; and, 2. Another class, who, in consequence of their peculiar relation with regard to the owner of the thing sold, are totally incapable of becoming purchasers, while that relation exists; these are trustees, guardians, assignees of insolvents, and generally all persons who, by their connexion with the owner, or by being employed concerning his affairs, have acquired, a knowledge of his property, as attorneys, conveyancers, and the like.There must be a thing which is the object of the sale, for if the thing sold at the time of the sale had ceased to exist it is clear there can be no sale; if, for example, Paul sell his horse to Peter, and, at the time of the sale the horse be dead, though the fact was unknown to both parties: or, if you and I being in Philadelphia, I sell you my house in Cincinnati, and, at the time of the sale it be burned down, it is manifest there was no sale, as there was not a thing to be sold. It is evident, too, that no sale can be made of things not in commerce, as the air, the water of the sea, and the like. When there has been a mistake made as to the article sold, there is no sale; as, for example, where a broker, who is the agent of both parties, sells an article and delivers to the seller a sold note describing the article sold as "St. Petershurg clean hemp," and bought note to, the buyer, as "Riga Rhine hemp," there is no sale.There must be an agreement as to the specific goods which form the basis of the contract of sale; in other words, to make a perfect sale, the parties must have agreed the one to part with the title to a specific article, and the other to acquire such title; an agreement to sell one hundred bushels of wheat, to be measured out of a heap, does not change the property, until the wheat has been measured.To constitute a sale there must be a price agreed upon; but upon the maxim id certum est quod reddi certum potest, a sale may be valid although it is agreed that the rice for the thing sold shall be determined by a third person. The price must have the three following qualities, to wit: 1. It must be an actual or serious price. 2. It must be certain or capable of being rendered certain. 3. It must consist of a sum of money.The price must be an actual or serious price, with an intention on the part of the seller, to require its payment; if, therefore, one should sell a thing to another, and, by the same agreement, he should release the buyer from the payment, this would not be a sale but a gift, because in that case the buyer never agreed to pay any price, the same agreement by which the title to the thing is passed to him discharging him from all obligations to pay for it. As to the quantum of the price that is altogether immaterial, unless there has been fraud in the transaction. 2. The price must be certain or determined, but it is sufficiently certain, if, as before observed, it be left to the deterimination of a third person. And an agreement to pay for goods what they are worth, is sufficiently certain. 3. The price must consist in a sum of money which the buyer agrees to pay to the seller, for if paid for in any other way, the contract would be an exchange or barter, and not a sale, as before observed.The consent of the contracting parties, which is of the essence of a sale, consists in the agreement of the will of the seller to sell a certain thing to the buyer, for a certain price, and in the will of the buyer, to purchase the same thing for the same, price. Care must be taken to distinguish between an agreement to enter into a future contract, and a present actual agreement to make a sale. This consent may be shown, 1. By an express agreement. 2. By all implied agreement.The consent is certain when the parties expressly declare it. This, in some cases, it is requisite should be in writing. By the 17tth section of the English statute, 29 Car. II. c. 3, commonly called the Statute of Frauds, it is enacted, "that no contract for the sale of any goods, wares, or merchan-dise, for the price of �10 or upwards, shall be allowed to be good, except the buyer shall accept part of the goods so sold, and actually receive the same, or give something in earnest to bind the bargain, or in part payment, or some note or memorandum in writing of the said bargain be made and signed by the parties to be charged by such contract or their agents thereunto lawfully authorized." This statute has been renacted in most of the states of the Union, with amendments and alterations,It not unfrequently happens that the consent of the parties to a contract of sale is given in the course of a correspondence. To make such contract valid, both parties must concur in it at the same time. An express consent to a sale may be given verbally, when it is not required by the statute of frauds to be in writing.When a party, by his acts, approves of what has been done, as if he knowingly uses goods which have been left at his house by another who intended to sell them, he will, by that act, confirm the sale.The consent must relate, 1. To the thing which is the object of the contract; 2. To the price; and, 3. To the sale itself. 1st. Both parties must agree upon the same object of the sale; if therefore one give consent to buy one thing, and the other to sell another, there is no sale; nor is there a sale if one sells me a bag full of oats, which I understand is full of wheat; because there is no consent as to the thing which is the object of the sale. But the sale would be valid, although I might be mistaken as to the quality of the tiling sold. 2d. Both parties must agree as to the same price, for if the seller intends to sell for a greater sum than the buyer intends to give, there is no mutual consent; but if the case were reversed, and the seller intended to sell for a less price than the buyer intended to give, the sale would be good for the lesser sum. 3d. The consent must be on the sale itself, that is, one intends to sell, and the other to buy. If, therefore, Peter intended to lease his house for three hundred dollars a year for ten years, and Paul intended to buy it for three thousand dollars, there would not be a contract of sale nor a lease.In order to pass the property by a sale, there must be an express or implied agreement that the title shall pass. An agreement for the sale of goods is prima facie a bargain and sale of those goods; but this arises merely from the presumed intention of the parties, and if it appear that the parties have agreed, not that there shall be a mutual credit by which the property is to pass from the seller to the buyer, and the buyer is bound to pay the price to the seller, but that the exchange of the money for the goods shall be made on the. spot, no property is transferred, for it is not the intention of the parties to transfer any. But, on the contrary, when the making of part payment, or naming a day for payment, clearly shows an intention in the parties that they should have some time to complete the sale by payment and delivery, and that they should in the meantime be trustees for each other, the one of the property in the chattel, and the other in the price. As a general rule, when a bargain is made for the purchase of goods, and nothing is said about payment and. delivery, the property passes immediately, so as to cast upon the purchaser all future risk, if nothing remains to be done to the goods, although he cannot take them away without paying the price.Sales are absolute or conditional. An absolute sale is one made and completed without any condition whatever. A conditional sale is one which depends for its validity upon the fulfilment of some condition.Sales are also voluntary or forced, public or private.A voluntary sale is one made without constraint freely by the owner of the thing sold; to such the usual rules relating to sales apply. 2. A forced sale is one made without the consent of the owner of the property by some officer appointed by law, as by a marshal or a sheriff in obedience to the mandate of a competent tribunal. This sale has the effect to transfer all the rights the owner had in the property, but it does not, like a voluntary sale of personal property, guaranty a title to the thing sold it merely transfers the rights of the person as whose property it has been seized. This kind of a sale is sometimes called a judicial sale. 3. A public sale is one made at auction to the highest bidder. Auction sales sometimes are voluntary, as when the owner chooses to sell his goods in this way, and then as between the seller and the buyer the usual rules relating to sales apply; or they are involuntary or foreed when the same rules do not apply. 4. Private sales are those made voluntarily and not at auction.The above rules apply to sales of personal property. The sale of real estate is governed by other rules. When a contract has been entered into for the sale of lands, the legal estate in such lands still remains vested in the vendor, and it does not become vested in the vendee until he shall have re-ceived a lawful deed of conveyance from the vendor to him; and the only remedy of the purchaser at Iaw, is to bring an action on the contract, and recover pecuniary damages for a breach of the contract. In equity, however, after a contract for the sale, the lands are considered as belonging to the purchaser, and the court will enforce his rights by a decree for a specific performance; and the seller will be entitled to the purchase money.In general, the seller of real estate does not guaranty the title; and if it be desired that he should, this must be done by inserting a warranty to that effect.--b--
Bitcoin Cash Can Scale Exponentially and Support the Global Economy - Bitcoin News
😄 Good
cryptocurrency-ico | September 13, 2018
Who cares who owns this site. It has nothing to do with what the world needs. A crypto with near zero fees with the capacity to do all the transactions of the banked and the unbanked. BTC can't even do 300k transactions a day without breaking down. DOGE in that regard is more competent than BTC.
24 Countries and IMF Discuss Global Standards of Crypto Regulation - Bitcoin News
😶 Unknown
cryptocurrency-regulation | April 29, 2019
Only 24 financial authorities and 11 international organizations? Crypto has way more of those. These old grandpas can’t compete.
Norwegian Startup Bitruption Plans to Launch a Localbitcoins Competitor - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
ethereum | November 06, 2018
You sympathize with Legal Terrorists. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Following the Crypto-Anarchist Dream: 3 Reasons to Reject KYC and AML - Bitcoin News
😕 Eh
bitcoincash | December 24, 2018
We all know that KYC and AML are not there to prevent foul play. They are just an excuse to have control over the population. AML could easily disappear with the adoption of crypto since it can’t be laundered. Public Keys can easily replace ID verification without revealing personal information. The same thing happens with transportation laws. How can you justify that electric scooters are illegal to ride on the sidewalk and kick scooters are illegal on the road? Some kickscooters travel faster than their electric counterparts. Then you have people getting run over by cars and dying and yet they claim that scooters should be banned from sidewalks because they are dangerous. It all comes down to control. All these laws are placed on purpose to tax you. Digital Fiat Currencies are hackable and launderable on purpose.
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😄 Good
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
There is “legal definition”, “public definition”, “public concept”. “Public concept” becomes “public definition” when more than 51% of the users of a word agree on a definition. So I was referring to the public definitions of “currency” and “asset” because I looked them up in the dictionary. Again you are using legal terms and definitions which confuse those who speak general English which is unwelcome in this non legal form of communication. For example you continue to refer to people who deviate from the legal system as “terrorists” which is a legal term instead of referring to them as “the public”.
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😒 Not Good
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
Look up the public definition for “currency” and compare it to the “legal” definition. You will see that they are in conflict with each other. You are confusing yourself because you are not aware of when you are speaking “legalese” or plain English. Lawmakers always speak in “legalese” to the public so you must interpret their words with legal definitions and not whith public definitions. Cryptocurrencies where created by the public thus the language used to describe them was defined by the public and not by a legal entity. That’s why people refer to them as coins even though it doesn’t fit the legal definition.
Sales Tax and Bitcoin in the United States Can Be Confusing - Bitcoin News
😟 Bad
cryptocurrency-taxes | September 12, 2018
These states are criminals and have broken the law. The legal definition for a "sale" makes it illegal to tax any form of barter that doesn't involve money. If this definition where to change to allow for cryptocurrency barter to be considered legally a "sale" then this would also make it legal for a Bitcoin miner to charge a transaction fee on any "sale" involving dollars or fiat where Bitcoin was not involved because otherwise the "business" would be guilty of "evading transaction fees" and "laundering cryptocurrencies"
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
No, they weren’t “terrorists” because the legal definition that is used today didn’t exist yet. The term is only 17 years old. I think you said it yourself they where referred to as “dissidents”. What ever that means in legalese.
Don’t Hate EU Internet Regulation – Defy It - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
bitcoincash | September 16, 2018
Incase the internet fails, there is always Freenet. You can't regulate that. We should have a P2P internet that works like OpenBazaar. That way all content is hosted on everyones computer. No need for big servers controlling what we post.
Don’t Hate EU Internet Regulation – Defy It - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
bitcoincash | September 16, 2018
P2P internet doesn’t require trust. Everyone is responsible for what they upload. What you are describing is the current centralized internet you are already using.
Markets Update: XRP Briefly Dethrones ETH as Second Largest Crypto
😄 Good
cryptocurrency-altcoins | September 21, 2018
XRP isn't even a crypto. It's digitized Fiat.
Mexico Publishes Crypto Rules, Puts Central Bank in Charge - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
cryptocurrency-regulation | September 15, 2018
"Banco de Mexico" is an American Banknote Company. It says so on on the bottom of old Mexican bills. They have no legal authority over Mexicans.
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
It’s called crypto”currency” for a reason. I think you meant “legal currency”. Cryptocurrencies were designed on purpose to never be able to be legally defined, thus they can never become “legal currency”. The whole legal system is so ancient and slow to the evolution of language and meaning. And would you stop calling crypto’s “assets”? Look up the legal definition for the word “Asset”. It only applies to physical objects, not imaginary constructs like crypto currencies or money.
$800M BTC Wallet Reactivates: Tens of Millions to Exchanges - Bitcoin News
😠 Sucks
cryptocurrency-taxes | September 05, 2018
Did the owner decide BCH is the real Bitcoin?
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😶 Unknown
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
Finally, someone who recognizes the difference between some thing that is NOT "legal" and something that is "illegal". Either way, "illegal" or "not legal" Bitcoin is "tender".
Norwegian Startup Bitruption Plans to Launch a Localbitcoins Competitor - Bitcoin News
😒 Not Good
ethereum | November 06, 2018
There are other forms of Government other than the legal system and many are much more righteous and just. You don’t even know who invented the legal system, do you? I can tell you he was a criminal and a terrorist. His name is Hammurabi. Look it up. The idea that you need to take someone’s picture and personal information in order to identify them and somehow magically prevent a crime that way is stupid and archaic. There are more efficient ways to do it without having to know a person’s personal identifying information like what they look like or what their legal name is. Governments are in their right to request KYC but only in transactions where “money” is involved. That is because they issue that money and they issue birth certificates and id’s with personally identifiable information. That is not the case with Open Bazaar where money and legal naming is not involved making it a perfectly legal activity. So yes, I do believe it’s a good idea because the system of government OB uses has nothing to do with the legal system and works a lot better than the legal system. It actually prevents crime by making it economically unsustainable, where the legal system encourages crime when it issues “launderable money” making “crime” and so called “terrorism” economically profitable.
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😃 Like It
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
There is a huge difference in language between the public and the establishment otherwise lawyers would be out of a job. They serve as interpreters.
Indian Police Seize Unocoin's ATM, Arrest Two Founders - Bitcoin News
😟 Bad
cryptocurrency-taxes | October 25, 2018
I’ve used potatoes as “money” and it’s not “illegal”. I think the term you are looking for is “legal money”. Potatoes will never be used as “legal money”. Hmm.. maybe they should change the name from “ATM’s” to “ABM’s”. “Automatic Barter Machines”.
Lawmakers Have Defined Blockchain – Badly - Bitcoin News
😒 Not Good
bitcoincash | September 06, 2018
Blockchain is a series of data entries that are grouped into blocks and are entangled to one another in a series like a chain.The entanglement nor the entries have to be encrypted or mathematically related, but the do have to be related in such a way that makes any change to the entries noticeable in other entries of the chain not just the changed entry. The data contained within the blocks doesn't have to be a ledger nor the blockchain itself has to be distributed. You can have 1and only copy of a blockchain. The blockchain doesn't have to be digital. It can be made out of gears as long as it follows the same function as a digital one.
Start a Business – Do Not Ask for Permission, Skip the Bank Account - Bitcoin News
😄 Good
bitcoincash | September 12, 2018
Registered as self-employed? That's still asking for permission. How about not declairing anything and making them think you're homeless.
Don’t Hate EU Internet Regulation – Defy It - Bitcoin News
😟 Bad
bitcoincash | September 16, 2018
At least it’s a coin. Unlike BTC.
Taiwanese Candidate Accepts Crypto Donations, California Bans Them - Bitcoin News
😃 Like It
cryptocurrency-regulation | September 21, 2018
"it may be hard to track the origin of cryptocurrency contributions"? All crypto originates from mining. Lol.
Don’t Hate EU Internet Regulation – Defy It - Bitcoin News
😟 Bad
bitcoincash | September 16, 2018
Chains make good ledgers, but they make terrible internets. A good internet should allow you to take down your own content but make it impossible to take down other’s, defeating the purpose of a chain.
Bitcoin Cash Can Scale Exponentially and Support the Global Economy - Bitcoin News
😄 Good
cryptocurrency-ico | September 13, 2018
The original Bitcoin doesn't exist anymore since the adoption of Segwit. That's why it's referred to as bitcoincore.
Don’t Hate EU Internet Regulation – Defy It - Bitcoin News
😐 OK
bitcoincash | September 16, 2018
Except Mexico.Ask Mexico.
C O M E N T A R I S M O

I'm Linda!

I provide recommendations and help you discover news, products, videos and associated comments based on what you like.

Get more from comments around the web

Once signed in, you'll receive better, personalized recommendations. Navigate through comments and likes, comment or share them. Filter through comments and users's profiles. Interact with all users from one place. Find other people with shared interests and keep up with their discoveries.

Also: "By Reading Comments You Help people to be heard; Sharing ideas we'll make a better world."

I am always improving

My knowledge is constantly growing. I'm learning from you, the people who use my service. If you want to help, sign up now!